Tuesday, June 24, 2008
Hinduism vis a vis other religions- my opinion
After different readings which continues, i find the following things. I might be wrong- please tell me.
Hinduism is a guide for rulers. It has code of conduct only for judges (god or god like people)- for common mass it has deeds and its results- if you do good- you will get prize, if you do bad you will get punishment- by the god. You may do either- nothing is against Hinduism! You have an indicataion of what is better- but never a compulsion. You have an ideal- which you should try to be/ follow allthrough your life- and which every one is sure that you will not- by no means you can be perfect- but you need not to be! From Grihstha to Sanyasi- every one is Hindu! Rama and Ravna both were Hindus! Both the sides of Mahabharata were Hindus- relatives- own blood! And that was where the religion was tested! In the most trying circumstances! Where most people are confused, hinduism is very clear. That most important thing in life is life itself!
Other religions- you have a fixed code of conduct- if you do that you belong to that religion- or else not. If some thing was missed by the first person of the religion, the religion is devided at that point! And there is a wound at the division point! Hinduism is the religion of continuous evolution! Hinduism has been divided so many times and still the divisions have been so smooth; still it is so intact that the division and unity appears like branches of the single tree!
Minimum 4 religions from India have enlightened the world! But India itself remains only the source of light! The great Hinduism! Single like orange!
Some times few people try to creat CHIRAG TALE ANDHERA. I can simply say- Just avoid them, but human inside me says- try to bring them on right path- by making them to understand the basic religion- of humanity! All other religions are adavancements on and over that. And this basic religion is most closer to Hinduism- because it says that the most important thing in life is life itself!
Sunday, June 15, 2008
I like Mr. M. J. Akbar as an Indian, a journalist, a secularist an Indian Muslim . . . so many reasons including our geographical closeness. His article- "How Pakistan Insulates India from Terror" (Times of India, 15th june 2008) has made me to think in two opposite directoions which probably Mr. Akbar did not want readers to do.
If Mr. Akbar aims at Pakistan's present alone, he is 100% right that Pakistan as a dream land of muslims of the reason has failed measurably. Probably a simple emotional Muslim would not have expected or wished that. May be serving as a bad example, present Pakistan might be making the choice of the Indian Muslims easier in the era of confusions and misunderstandings. But if by that Mr. Akbar is aiming at demeaning the loss caused to the world humanity and civilization by bifurcation and later trifurcation of British India, he is making big mistake. In my opinion, present unrest led by "wrongly enlightened" muslims in the world is not associated with Islam, Muslim or their welfare. Yes, it is associated with the politics which is made on the name of such attractive words. And, in this regard, a unified Independent British India would have served as a stronger source of light through its socio- political and intellectual power. In that case world history would have been different. Totaly diferent. And, even now if we just understand this we can change this world.
And, in dividing British India, Britishers played pivotal role as the inducers, continuous catalysts and emerged as the only winners. That they were sad on division of the British Indian Army was a lesser and artificial truth mostly due to personal and emotional reasons if anything.
And, borders are not safe if made up of strong walls. If so, no fort would have been ever captured! Borders are unsafe only if the citizens/ security personals are not loyal or uncapable. And don't suspect the loyality of Muslims. Only short sighted and poorly informed people will do that, whoever he or she might be. Neither any one should suspect their patriotism, if some one does so, he or she should read the history again and again. And the loyality and patriotism comes through proper enlightenment. And that comes in this region naturaly due to the culture and civilisataion of this "region" which is based on knowledge, freedom and tolerance. Many examples of varied types can be seen on individual and community basis.
To finish, i would request Mr. Akbar to write another article to clarify these confusions if some one had. I think Mr. Akbar can do it in the best possible way and he is the best person to do that.